Volume 12 - Year 2025 - Pages 107-111
DOI: 10.11159/jbeb.2025.013

Femtosecond Laser Patterning Effects on High Entropy Alloy’s Biocompatibility


Furkan Biçer1, Sıdıka Mine Toker2

1Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Biotechnology and Biosafety Department
ESOGÜ Meşelik Campus, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Eskişehir, Turkey, 26040
505320241001@ogrenci.ogu.edu.tr
21Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
ESOGÜ Meşelik Campus, Faculty of Engineering - Architecture, M3 Building, Eskişehir, Turkey, 26040
stoker@ogu.edu.tr


Abstract - Metallic biomaterials are widely used in orthopedic applications, yet conventional metallic materials such as stainless steel face challenges including corrosion, ion release, and limited osseointegration. High-entropy alloys (HEAs) have recently gained attention as promising alternatives.

This study investigates the biocompatibility of a TiTaHfNbZr HEA and the effect of femtosecond laser surface modification. 316L stainless steel was employed as the reference. Surface characterization confirmed comparable roughness values for control samples, while laser treatment significantly increased the surface roughness of HEA.

Biological evaluation showed that HEA-control sample supported markedly higher cell proliferation than stainless steel, and HEA-modified sample further enhanced proliferation. Apoptosis assays revealed a higher proportion of viable cells on HEA compared to stainless steel. SEM analysis demonstrated improved cell attachment and spreading, particularly on laser-treated HEA surfaces.

Overall, TiTaHfNbZr HEA exhibited superior biocompatibility, and femtosecond laser modification further promoted favorable cell–material interactions, indicating strong potential for orthopedic implant applications.

Keywords:High entropy alloy, Biocompatibility, Orthopedic implant, Femtosecond laser.

© Copyright 2025 Authors This is an Open Access article published under the Creative Commons Attribution License terms. Unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.

Date Received: 2025-05-27
Date Revised: 2025-09-25
Date Accepted: 2025-10-20
Date Published: 2025-12-03

1. Introduction

Metallic biomaterials have attracted growing interest in biomedical engineering due to their excellent mechanical strength and acceptable biocompatibility. Their clinical use is especially common in orthopedic and dental implants, where durability and load-bearing capacity are essential [1]-[3]. Widely adopted examples include 316L stainless steel (SS), cobalt–chromium alloys, titanium alloys, and nickel–titanium alloys, all of which are valued for their favorable mechanical performance [4]-[6]. Despite this broad use, significant drawbacks remain, such as limited corrosion resistance, ion release, poor osseointegration, and mismatch in elastic modulus with bone tissue [7], [8]. These limitations highlight the urgent need for advanced metallic biomaterials with improved biological and mechanical properties.

High-entropy alloys (HEAs) have recently been introduced as promising candidates to overcome these challenges. Among them, the TiTaHfNbZr system combines mechanical robustness with strong potential for biocompatibility, making it suitable for biomedical applications [9]. Since implant surface characteristics directly influence cellular behavior and osseointegration, surface modification has become a key research focus. Femtosecond laser treatment offers precise control over surface topography while preserving bulk material properties, providing an effective route to enhance biological interactions [10]. Femtosecond laser surface texturing (FLST) has emerged as an effective technique for modifying implant surfaces at micro- and nano-scales, enhancing cell adhesion, alignment and promoting osseointegration. Recent studies have demonstrated that femtosecond laser-treated titanium and titanium alloy surfaces promote both cell adhesion and osteoblast migration [11, 12, 13]. For instance, Lackington et al. reported that bio-inspired micro- and nano-scale features produced on TiZr implants via femtosecond laser texturing significantly enhanced osseointegration [11]. Similarly, hierarchical laser-induced surface structures have been shown to guide osteoblast migration and support biological activity [12]. These findings highlight the clinical potential of FLST in implant surface modification and underscore its growing relevance in recent literature [13].

The present study investigates the biocompatibility and osseointegration potential of TiTaHfNbZr HEA and examines the role of femtosecond laser surface modification. This work provides a novel evaluation of how femtosecond laser–induced micro/nano-structured HEA surfaces influence cellular responses, including cell proliferation and apoptosis. Unlike previous studies, which have not studied the biological performance of laser-treated TiTaHfNbZr HEA in such detail, this research aims to clarify its biofunctional potential. Comparative evaluation with 316L stainless steel, a well-established biomedical alloy, is carried out to underline the advantages of HEA and demonstrate its potential for future orthopedic implant applications.

2. Methodologies

2.1. Sample Preparation

TiTaHfNbZr high-entropy alloy (HEA) with equiatomic composition was fabricated and cut into small samples, followed by grinding and polishing to standardize surface properties. This study provides one of the first biocompatibility evaluations of this material with a novel approach. 316L stainless steel (SS), a well-characterized orthopedic material, was used as a reference. Both HEA and SS specimens were prepared and characterized for surface morphology prior to biological testing.

In this study, among the designed laser surface patterns, the indent form pattern with a 50 µm spacing was selected for surface modification and biological evaluation. This specific topography represents a distinct configuration within the overall experimental design, allowing for a more focused assessment of its effect on cell behavior. Consequently, three groups were prepared: untreated SS, untreated HEA, and laser-patterned HEA (HEA-modified) for comparative analysis.

2.2. Surface Characterization

Surface characterization of control and laser-treated samples was initially performed using profilometry to determine average roughness (Ra) values and ensuring similar surface properties of HEA-control and SS samples.

2.3. Cell-material interactions

Cellular responses were evaluated to investigate the effects of material type and surface characteristics. Human bone osteosarcoma cells (Saos-2, ATCC HTB-85) were used throughout the cell-material interaction tests. Cells were cultivated in DMEM medium supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 1% GlutaMAX (Sigma Aldrich, product no: D6546). Cell proliferation was assessed using the 3-(4,5 Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) assay following a 3-day incubation period, in order to evaluate how both material composition and surface modification influenced proliferative activity. Apoptosis was analyzed using the Annexin V/Propidium Iodide (PI) staining protocol under the same conditions to determine the impact of material type and femtosecond laser treatment on cell viability. Finally, cell–material interactions were examined through cell fixation and imaging with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), enabling detailed investigation of cell morphology, adhesion, and spreading on the different surfaces. This combined approach provided a comprehensive assessment of proliferation, apoptosis, and cell–material interactions, allowing comparison between stainless steel, untreated HEA, and HEA-modified samples.

3. Results

Sample surfaces were first characterized using profilometry. According to the profilometer analysis, average surface roughness values of the control samples (SS and HEA-control) were found to be quite similar (±5%). In contrast, HEA-modified sample exhibited a significant increase in roughness—approximately 20-fold—compared to control samples (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Average roughness measurements of stainless steel, HEA-control and HEA-modified (R profiles and roughness values).

The MTT assay, performed to evaluate the influence of material type and surface features on cellular behaviour, demonstrated that the HEA-control samples induced approximately 2.5-fold higher cell proliferation per mm² compared to stainless steel. Moreover, laser-patterned HEA (HEA-modified) samples exhibited an additional ~40% increase in proliferation relative to HEA-control, with differences confirmed as statistically significant at the 95% confidence level using Tukey’s significance test. (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Cell proliferation test results of stainless steel, HEA-control and HEA-modified with statistical evaluations.

In the apoptosis assay, not only HEA-control but also HEA-modified samples exhibited approximately 20% higher proportions of viable cells compared to stainless steel. Additionally, femtosecond laser patterning did not negatively affect cell apoptosis rates as compared to the control group of HEA (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Cell apoptosis analysis results of stainless steel, HEA-control and HEA-modified samples, (Q2-3: viable cells quartile, Q2-2: apoptotic cells quartile)

SEM analysis of cell–material interactions revealed that laser-patterned HEA samples displayed enhanced cell attachment and broader surface coverage compared to untreated HEA-control. Furthermore, among the control groups, HEA surfaces showed higher cell density and more extensive cellular extensions on the material surface (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Cell-material interactions examined via SEM results of stainless steel, HEA-control and HEA-modified. SS image was reprinted from Biçer and Toker [1], materials today communication, 2023, vol. 37, 107273 with permission.

These findings are consistent with previous reports on femtosecond laser surface texturing, which have shown to enhance cell adhesion, guide osteoblast migration, and promote osseointegration on titanium-based implants [11–13]. These results suggest that the femtosecond laser–modified TiTaHfNbZr HEA surface supports improved early cellular responses compared to control groups. Such improvemnets are known to facilitate faster osseointegration and more stable implant–bone interfaces, which could potentially contribute to reduced healing time and lower revision risk in orthopedic applications.

5. Conclusion

The findings demonstrate that the TiTaHfNbZr high-entropy alloy offers substantially improved biocompatibility compared to 316L stainless steel, as evidenced by enhanced cellular proliferation, stronger adhesion, and higher viability. Surface modification via femtosecond laser patterning further amplified these effects by promoting favorable cell–material interactions and more extensive surface coverage. Collectively, the results suggest that elemental composition of high entropy alloy and laser surface patterning not only enhances intrinsic biocompatibility but also supports superior osseointegration, underscoring its significant potential as an innovative material for next-generation orthopedic implants.


References

[1] F. Biçer and S. M. Toker, "Effects of surface micro-deformation on the cellular response to metallic implant materials," Materials Today Communication, vol. 37, p. 107273, 2023. Available: View Article

[2] F. Biçer, S. M. Toker, M. N. Soykan, B. Türk Yılmaz, B. Yenice Gürsu, and O. Uysal, "Improving the Bioactivity and Antibiofilm Properties of Metallic Implant Materials via Controlled Surface Microdeformation," ACS Omega, vol. 9, no. 42, pp. 43138–43155, 2024. Available: View Article

[3] S. Chowdhury and N. Arunachalam, "Surface functionalization of additively manufactured titanium alloy for orthopaedic implant applications," Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 102, pp. 387–405, 2023. Available: View Article

[4] N. S. Manam, W. S. W. Harun, D. N. A. Shri, S. A. C. Ghani, T. Kurniawan, M. H. Ismail, and M. H. I. Ibrahim, "Study of corrosion in biocompatible metals for implants: A review," Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 701, pp. 698–715, 2017. Available: View Article

[5] S. M. Toker, "Effects of Surface Characteristics on the in vitro Biocompatibility Response of NiTi Shape Memory Alloys," Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 285–290, 2019. Available: View Article

[6] R. Mirea, A. T. Cucuruz, L. C. Ceatra, T. Badea, I. Biris, E. Popescu, A. Paraschiv, R. Ene, G. Sbarcea, and M. Cretu, "In-Depth Comparative Assessment of Different Metallic Biomaterials in Simulated Body Fluid," Materials, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 2774, 2021. Available: View Article

[7] B. Beig, U. Liaqat, M. F. K. Niazi, I. Douna, M. Zahoor, and M. B. K. Niazi, "Current Challenges and Innovative Developments in Hydroxyapatite-Based Coatings on Metallic Materials for Bone Implantation: A Review," Coatings, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 1249, 2020. Available: View Article

[8] L. Shi, L. Shi, L. Wang, Y. Duan, W. Lei, Z. Wang, J. Li, X. Fan, X. Li, S. Li, and Z. Guo, "The Improved Biological Performance of a Novel Low Elastic Modulus Implant," PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 2, p. e55015, 2013. Available: View Article

[9] A. Motallebzadeh, M. B. Yagci, E. Bedir, C. B. Aksoy, and D. Canadinc, "Mechanical Properties of TiTaHfNbZr High-Entropy Alloy Coatings Deposited on NiTi Shape Memory Alloy Substrates," Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 49, pp. 1992–1997, 2018. Available: View Article

[10] P. Li, T. Zhou, M. Zhang, W. Guo, Y. Cui, D. Zhang, P. Liu, L. Zhou, X. Zhou, H. He, C. Pan, B. Liu, and Y. Guo, "Surface texture fabricated by ultrafast laser treatment for manipulating wettability and cell adhesion performance of Ti6Al4V," Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 489, p. 131103, 2024. Available: View Article

[11] W. A. Lackington, B. Bellon, S. Guimond, P. Schweizer, C. Cancellieri, A. Ambeza, A. Chopard-Lallier, B. Pippenger, A. Armutlulu, X. Maeder, P. Schmutz, and M. Rottmar, "Bio-Inspired Micro- and Nano-Scale Surface Features Produced by Femtosecond Laser-Texturing Enhance TiZr-Implant Osseointegration," Advanced Healthcare Materials, vol. 13, no. 23, 2400810, 2024. Available: View Article

[12] J. Heitz, S. Glanchs, L. Wagner, C. Wolf, C. Plamadeala, M. Muck, K. Seibert, C. Maier, R. Marek, A. Weth, and W. Baumgartner, "Guidance of Osteoblast Migration Using Femtosecond Laser-Induced Hierarchical Structures," Coatings, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 127, 2025. Available: View Article

[13] V. M. Villapun, K. Man, L. Carter, P. Penchev, S. Dimov, and S. Cox, "Laser texturing of additively manufactured implants: A tool to programme biological response," Biomaterials Advances, vol. 153, p. 213574, 2023. Available: View Article